“Disheartening” was the word used by the Orange County health officer to describe the fact that a disease that had been all but eliminated in the United States in 2000 is now the cause of an epidemic spreading from Southern California to several other states across the country and into Mexico. NPR’s Melissa Block had asked Dr. Eric Handler his reaction to the situation that had its start before Christmas at Disneyland, carried by one unvaccinated tourist and spread rapidly among several native-born citizens who had not been vaccinated. The highly contagious disease is one that we tended to lump together in our minds with all those childhood ailments that, one by one, were brought under control by the development of a vaccine.
As a young mother, I remember marveling that our children could be protected from diseases that we suffered through in our own childhoods: whooping cough, measles, rubella (German measles), mumps. Once the disease had passed you were pretty much assured of having natural immunity. (My younger brother came down with chicken pox and we both were quarantined, a bold sign on the front door warning others away. I was spared and years later, when both my children had the disease, I cared for them and was again not affected. So when a physician suggested I go for a newly developed anti-shingles vaccine for anyone who’d ever had chicken pox, I could happily decline.)
An earlier NPR report noted that anyone born before 1959 is protected from the current measles epidemic because it would be assumed they’d had the disease as children and carried natural immunity. Before the vaccine was introduced in 1963, the U.S. experienced some four million reported cases a year. In 2000 the number was zero.
And now it’s back. Even before the current epidemic, the CDC reported that 2014 saw a record number of cases — 644 from 27 states. The reason is a growing anti-vaccination movement that finds parents opting out of vaccinations for their children based on fears resulting from a report, since discredited, of a link between inoculations and autism. Major scientific organizations all refute the claims. Now, a generation of doctors who have never seen measles is frantically trying to catch up on the symptoms and treatment of the disease. Untreated or treated late, measles can lead to serious complications, even death.
A strongly worded editorial in The Los Angeles Times calls for an end to the practice of allowing parents to opt-out of immunizations requirements for their school-age children on the basis of “personal beliefs.” The outbreak has illustrated “how a highly contagious disease can spread when the vaccination rate falls below the level needed for ‘herd immunity,’” the paper wrote, explaining that herd immunity means “that so many people are immune that the chance of outbreak is low, which protects the few who are not immunized because they are too young to have been fully vaccinated or because they are among the few in whom the vaccine doesn’t ‘take’ or because they haven’t been vaccinated for valid medical reasons.”
As the paper stated in another editorial, “Getting vaccinated is good for the health of the inoculated person and also part of one’s public responsibility to help protect the health of others.”
Once again, we must be reminded that we’re all in this together, folks.
Graph: U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
I wonder why schools don’t ban children who don’t have the vaccine. They do for other vaccines. The whole thing is really maddening and, yes, it confirms my suspicion that we are more “third world” than many t.w. countries. Dorothy
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:15:43 +0000 To: firstname.lastname@example.org
That’s what they did in our day, but now there is this misguided “personal belief” option that allows parents an exemption. I read that 27 states do not allow such an option and that three states offer no exemptions, not even for religious beliefs. But this epidemic is waking people up to the fallacy of it all and I believe changes are coming. In addition to the editorial that is linked in my post, you could also look at Michael Hiltzik’s column in the LA Times to see how angry it makes some people:
I agree that our society has become much too complacent in our need to be politically correct. Of course, we let people believe whatever they want to believe — that is a fundamental right. However, we do not allow them to do whatever they please, just because they have that belief. We have always enforced certain laws and regulations for the protection of the public. But over the years, our desire to not offend has grown to the point that we allow actions (or inactions) which are extremely dangerous to society as a whole.
I see nothing wrong with returning to the rules on inoculations which succeeded years ago in virtually wiping out these “childhood diseases” from our “first world” society, lest we slip into a self-induced “third world” condition. “No shots, no school” was perfectly acceptable just a few years ago and needs to be enforced. The only exemptions allowed should be confirmed medical conditions, attested by board-certified physicians.
I am sorry. This is a war on disease, a matter of life or death, not cocktail party chatter, governed by “personal belief”. The conscientious objectors are free to leave our society.
Roger this is exactly true. It couldn’t have been said better. We truly need to wake up and face the cold hard facts and not be too “sensitive” about practical matters. Thank you.
Yes, Susan. I agree. I think that we should continue to be compassionate and unoffensive in general, but there are limits to what we can accept. When the actions of others become a threat to our way of life, it is time to speak up and take action. Unfortunately, in this case, it appears we have an affluent and educated block of our population who smugly (and stupidly) believe they know better than our medical scientists, so they will not have their children vaccinated. Our laws and regulations need to be rapidly changed to address this situation.
Wow! Very well said. Thanks.
Another voice of reason, Frank Bruni in The New York Times equates the anti-vaccination crowd with climate change deniers. “We’re a curious species,” he writes, “and sometimes a sad one, chasing knowledge only to deny it, making progress only to turn away from its benefits.” You can read his entire column at: